Monday, January 25, 2010

Wrapped Up in a Moonage Daydream

Marc Bolan and T. Rex sang of “the children of the revolution” and it is precisely the mid-seventies lives of these British children that Todd Haynes sets out to portray in his 1998 film Velvet Goldmine. The glam rock era prefigured the punks and it was a time, similar to today, where image was everything and the influence of glam rockers such as the aforementioned T. Rex, Slade and early David Bowie can be seen in pop stars of today such as Lady Gaga. It is a fascinating and exceedingly well-produced film that serves as an adequate introductory course in glam rock but in the end, fails to fully congeal into an entirely successful film in part because of its sometimes awkward flashback narrative structure.
Not even the most vitriolic critic could find fault with Haynes’ cast, many of who have gone on and achieved much greater success since their roles in Velvet Goldmine. Christian Bale plays Arthur Stuart, a newspaper reporter and obsessive fan of the pop star Brian Slade (Jonathan Rhys-Meyers), whose “murder” opens the film. Brian Slade appears to be a composite of Ziggy Stardust-era Bowie and Roxy Music’s Bryan Ferry, also taking his last name from another glam rock band. Ewan McGregor plays Kurt Wild, the Iggy Pop surrogate while Eddie Izzard and Toni Collette play supporting roles.
The performances are uniformly excellent and clearly show that the actors have studied many of the pop stars that they emulated. In particular, Mr. Rhys-Meyers brilliantly captures the coke-addled nature of the seventies pop star and there is a homage to David Bowie’s televised performance of “Starman” when Slade pretends to fellate his guitarist in mid-song that music fans may enjoy. Mr. McGregor also makes a more than passable Iggy Pop and manages to capture the unique, yet extremely self-destructive charisma and mythos that surrounds the ‘Godfather of Punk’. His miming to the Stooges’ classic “TV Eye” was very realistic though there seems to be little historical grounding in the bisexuality of the singer or for really much of the film itself. The film claims to be a historical document of a time period and of a music scene, though there seems to be a great deal of flippancy regarding the historicity of the film’s characters to their possible real-life counterparts.
Haynes does an excellent job of recapturing the atmosphere of seventies glam in the mise-en-scene and set design within the film. One particularly striking scene that shows the copious research that Haynes must have done is the one in the Sombrero Club where during Slade’s star-making performance, at a table in the back, men are shown in the back speaking Polari. Polari was the underground homosexual slang spoken by Londoners, primarily during the fifties and sixties.
Another delightful touch was his addition of a female playing the New York Dolls “Personality Crisis”, as this was a song originally done by a New York band of lecherously heterosexual men who wore female dress on stage. The film is filled with allusions and references to pop-culture trivia and it can be a fun game to attempt to spot them. It’s a shame that the film sometimes becomes too muddled up in being visually attractive and outrageous, that the story sometimes becomes bogged down. This ambition, nevertheless, is not something that the film should be derided for and it stands as a remarkable encapsulation of the ethos of the glam scene and the ripples that still emanate from it.

2 comments:

  1. Good intro and great intriguing summary....I like that you just touch on a few main points without giving too much away. I also like your connection to current day pop star Lady Gaga because I also thought of her with the eccentric costumes in this film. I liked reading many of your observations as I did not notice many of them myself such as the "Polari" language..that is great context!

    I got a little lost in some of the connections you were trying to make, but maybe that is because I didn't fully understand the movie. Regardless I think you add a lot of information in this that might make it a little dense for just the average reader. I am thinking that your audience might be more the New Yorker-type?

    Overall, nice use of language and great authority!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Haha, thanks for the comments! Yeah, I think I was probably shooting for the New Yorker haha.

    ReplyDelete